by Adrian Petrescu

At scale, rare events aren't rare.

If Google's first production server resembles a hastily cobbled together amalgam of off-the-shelf computer parts circa 1999, well, that's because it is. Just like Google's original servers at Stanford. If you think this rack is scary, you should see what it replaced. Instead of buying whatever pre-built rack-mount servers Dell, Compaq, and IBM were selling at the time, Google opted to hand-build their server infrastructure themselves. The sagging motherboards and hard drives are literally propped in place on handmade plywood platforms. The power switches are crudely mounted in front, the network cables draped along each side. The poorly routed power connectors snake their way back to generic PC power supplies in the rear.
The Usenet post that started it all
From: torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Benedict Torvalds) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: What would you like to see most in minix? Summary: small poll for my new operating system Message-ID: <1991Aug25.205708.9541@klaava.Helsinki.FI> Date: 25 Aug 91 20:57:08 GMT Organization: University of Helsinki Hello everybody out there using minix - I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons) among other things). I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want. Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them :-) Linus (torvalds@kruuna.helsinki.fi) PS. Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs. It is NOT protable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(.







The interesting thing about cloud computing is that we've redefined cloud computing to include everything that we already do... The computer industry is the only industry that is more fashion-driven than women's fashion. Maybe I'm an idiot, but I have no idea what anyone is talking about. What is it? It's complete gibberish. It's insane. When is this idiocy going to stop?

"Maybe I'm an idiot"
A story in three parts.

On-Demand Pricing
A fixed, region-specific price is charged for each instance type, prorated down to the second. Always the same, regardless of utilization or availability. Usually a poor choice for predictable or sustained workloads.
Spot Pricing
Amazon runs a constant auction for unused capacity for each instance type, in each availability zone. While your bid is higher than the current spot price, you get your instance order filled (at the lowest price). As soon as it isn’t anymore, your instance is turned off. Perfect for pre-emptable workloads that can be easily abandoned, resumed, or retried.
Reserved Pricing
Reservations allow you to purchase a discount on the hourly on-demand rate. Reservations are for a specific availability zone and instance type, and cannot be converted (unless it is a special “Convertible RI”) Reserved capacity can be bought and sold on the AWS Marketplace.
Savings Plan
Essentially a more flexible version of Reserved Instances. You’re still purchasing a discount on standard On-Demand rates, but via a term commitment rather than an up-front payment. Less efficient than an RI but more flexible and with better cash flow.